Friday, October 30, 2015

The Third GOP Debate: Rubio Rockets, Cruz Missiles, Carson Drones, Bush Tanks and CNBC Bombs

The headlines from the CNBC debate on Wednesday night:
  1. Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz advanced their causes.
  2. Donald Trump is growing more palatable and credible as a possible candidate.
  3. The mystery of why Ben Carson is leading everyone else intensifies.
  4. Jeb Bush’s candidacy has just been transferred to the ICU.
  5. CNBC did what no one at CNN has been able to accomplish in years: it made CNN look like a first rate news service.

Let’s start with an interesting but rather subtle shift seemed to occur in the Republican debate on Wednesday night. For different reasons, the ten candidates on the stage seemed to come into a sudden alignment on exactly who the enemy is. And, no, it actually is not Hillary Clinton or her pinko sidekick from Back to the Future.

In this debate, every candidate coalesced around the idea that the single most evil, incompetent, wasteful, dishonest, lying, stealing, cheating, and – worst of all -- regulating organization in the world is the one that they are all competing ferociously to lead.

The enemy Wednesday night was the Federal Government. The neat trick about this new definition of the enemy is that it could be the long-sought Republican “Big Tent” that can unite the fraying party factions. It’s an obvious platform for outsiders Trump, Carson and Fiorina. It works great for states’ rights governors Kasich, Huckabee, Jindal, and Christie. It allows senators Rubio, Paul, Cruz and Graham to bash the very institution they work for – and even its Republican leadership. Dear heaven, it was even lovingly embraced by Jeb Bush, whose brother and father actually led the federal government for 12 out of the last 27 years!

Nothing the Federal government does could not be done better by the states or by the private sector. Nothing. Period. The Federal government creates problems and then exacerbates them when it tries to fix them (Fiorina). The Federal government steals your money and lies about it (Christie) to a degree that is actually worse than Bernie Madoff (Huckabee). The Federal government solves every problem by spending more (Cruz). Federal regulations always add cost that burdens poor and middle income families (Carson). The Federal government is incompetent at everything it does (everybody). The evening was neatly tied together by Rand Paul, whose ideal government was “so small that you can’t see it.”

Sure, the Democrats are worse than the Republicans on this, they mentioned, but the real theme of the evening was that the Federal government is a bi-partisan catastrophe, an out-of-control spending machine that is the fault of everyone and everybody who touches it.

Let’s state this a different, and perhaps more telling, way.

Every single candidate has now finally figured out that Trump, Carson, and Fiorina are not Republicans at all. They are pure-play outsiders who are winning on the antipathy that Americans feel toward the dysfunction of government. And so the actual Republicans on the stage spent most of the evening trying to each establish their own personal brands of renegade, anti-government outsider-hood.

And here is the real zinger.

The two guys who made the most progress last night were two guys who are actually on the Federal Government payroll.

So who won and who lost in this evolving world-view?

Marco Rubio made enormous strides in this debate. He continues to be charismatic, polished, extremely well prepared and deft on his feet. He demonstrated command over some of the evening’s more arcane fiscal policy scrums (hey, I thought “H One B” was a virus!).  He neatly pivoted on Jeb Bush’s pathetic attack on Rubio’s recent confession to Senatorial ennui, turning it into a generational clarion call for change. Deftly, he alone found a way to insert the word “Benghazi” into a debate on economics, which is wired to automatically light up the “applause” sign in all Republican venues. And he thought up a new way to vilify the left-leaning-eastern-elite-establishment-lame-stream media, introducing the notion that it should be viewed a mammoth Super Pac for the Democratic Party. But, please:  if Republicans castigate CNBC as leftist leaning, those socialists over at the Wall Street Journal must be next.  Bottom line: give the Beaver an A-.

The Cruz missiles were flying at this debate, as the self-pleasuring master-debater rocked the house repeatedly over the course of the evening. It was newsworthy that Cruz seemed to be doubling down on his vicious attacks on his own party’s congressional leaders, given that the Freedom Caucus had so recently blinked – and blinked hard – in capitulating to Paul Ryan’s ransom note. But give Ted Cruz his due: he brilliantly ticked off the five first “gotcha” questions from the CNBC moderators and blasted them for their bias and lack of respect for the candidates.

And you know what? He was right. John Harwood is a first class journalist, but his opening question to Donald Trump – essentially asking him if his campaign was a joke – set the evening off in a foolishly contentious path from which CNBC will not recover soon.  

Holding ground:

Admit it, lefty, Donald Trump is getting better at this, rapidly. Consider that just a few short months ago that Republican Party cognoscenti were privately purring that Donald Trump was the perfect crazy extremist foil – Cheryl Bachman turned on overdrive -- to serve the purpose of bringing the party to its senses and causing it to embrace Jeb Bush as the sane and sensible centrist who could unite the party and win.  Now, Ben Carson has usurped that role and is making the GOP embrace Donald Trump as the sane and sensible centrist who could unite the party and win. Harwood’s opening question had the amazing effect of making the audience sympathetic to Trump, and The Donald pounced. He had a good evening, with a strong finish – trumpeting how he had used his genius for negotiation to force CNBC to shorten the debate to two hours. And, in limiting CNBC to two hours, everyone in the world agreed that Donald had performed an invaluable service to humanity.

Someday, the world will figure out that Dr. Carson is Yoda gone to the dark side, an intentionally mysterious man whose sotto-voce affectation, heavy eyelids, and enigmatic riddle-speak are apparently soothing to Bible-toting social conservatives who just want someone who will unequivocally say that the Christian God is in the pilot seat. Ben Carson says crazy things out loud. We know it all: Obamacare is slavery, that the United States can be compared to Nazi Germany, and that the Holocaust would not have happened if the Jews thought like the NRA. But Carson as carcinogen was not on display in Colorado; the focus on fiscal issues kept the conversation away from the most incendiary of his topics.  He was his usually fuzzy-illogic; muddling through answers and always meandering to his mantra, “and that’s why the United States is by the people for the people and of the people.” The physics of inertia worked in his favor; though… nothing he did damaged him. He will emerge from this debate with generally unchanged polling numbers.

The Losers: Everybody else.

It seems like it is still early in the campaign, but wet cement dries quickly. Repeated failures to generate excitement and momentum gradually turn into hardened images of ineffectuality. Chris Christie had his debate moments, but he is clearly losing the “angry centrist governor” battle to Kasich. Carly Fiorina is losing the “proven CEO” battle to Trump. Mike Huckabee is losing the evangelical battle to Cruz. And I find it hard to imagine how this debate would have been the slightest bit different had Rand Paul spent the evening in a room at Motel 6.  

The Jeb Bush camp has got to be in full-throttle panic mode by now. An unskilled debater, Jeb seems to go for the capillary rather than the jugular. He made a terrible decision to take a cheap, pointless shot at Marco Rubio about his senate attendance record, making himself look scared, and providing Rubio with a grooved softball that Rubio hit into the upper deck. Jeb’s oratorical style has all the impact of a nerf ball; he may well be the guy that the Microsoft engineers had in mind when they created PowerPoint, conveying his vision for the future of mankind in tidy sequential bullets using the default font.

Jeb is at a crisis point. You could argue that right now he is in third place in the “angry centrist governor” battle -- behind both Kasich and Christie. At least those two have fire in the belly.  Now is the time to ask whether Jeb has ever really ached to be President, or if this half-baked dalliance is just an obligation he feels to his family legacy.

But the biggest loser is CNBC.

It was a real disappointment to see the not-yet-ready-for-even-cable-primetime performance of the CNBC team. John Harwood is a respected professional (indeed, Harwood asked that question that led to Rick Perry’s candidacy-ending amnesia), but his questions were angry and arrogant. Rebecca Quick was repeatedly embarrassed for her inability to prove the source of the “gotcha” quotes she flung at the candidates.
Perhaps worse, CNBC simply lost control of the debate. We’ll call it the “Webb Cam,” which is when candidates whine about their time allotment and simply refuse to stop talking, trampling over the hapless moderators.  Repeatedly throughout the evening, the candidates simply ignored the question put before them and said, “I need to go back and get my turn to answer the last question.” CNBC cut some people off, and not others. The atmosphere became contentious and toxic; ironically providing a unifying moment for the candidates, as they took turns applauding each other’s civility and stature in the face of the CNBC treatment.
The pity of it is that when the media lives up to the charge of being biased, arrogant, and on a search-and-destroy mission, it provides fresh tanks of oxygen to the Red Staters (and their candidates!) who in turn have greater leeway to dismiss the fair questions of even-handed journalist.

And, by the way, how hard is it to give and candidate sixty seconds and then just turn off the microphone?

For that matter: can we please start the debate on time?  We are trained by history to expect the debates to begin when they are advertised to begin, which in this case was 8 PM.  Instead CNBC made us listen to second-rate blather for 15 minutes, and they even chatted over the candidate introductions.

Here’s my bottom line: if you are going to give CNBC a debate and watch this joke play out, then let’s give equal time to a really serious network where far more people get their news – Comedy Central.


  1. The Daily Show missed the mark when they did not replace Jon Stewart with you Steve!!!!

  2. Astonishing work by awesome people out there. An obligation of appreciation is all together for this grand post working close by. Continue doing magnificent

    파워볼 메이저사이트

  3. Wow, what a great knowledge you have shared admin this is one of the best blogs I have ever read.


  4. You are doing amazing work keep it up, and thank you so much for sharing this important and useful information with us and all the best for your upcoming post.


  5. We are really grateful for your blog post for giving a lot of information카지노사이트

  6. Thanks for such a valuable post. I am waiting for your next post, I have enjoyed a lot reading this post keep it up.온라인카지노

  7. Such an amazing and helpful post. I really really love it.

  8. Your article is very interesting. I think this article has a lot of information needed, looking forward to your new posts.카지노사이트

  9. I've been looking for photos and articles on this topic over the past few days due to a school assignment, keonhacai and I'm really happy to find a post with the material I was looking for! I bookmark and will come often! Thanks :D

  10. Thank you for every other magnificent post. The place else could anybody get that type
    of info in such a perfect way of writing? I have a presentation subsequent week, and I'm at the
    search for such information.
    click me here카지노사이트


  11. 메이저검증업체 how do you say it? Relevant!! Finally I've found something which helped me. Thank you!

  12. There is definately a great deal to find out about this topic. I really like all of the points you've made. 토토검증업체

  13. exceptionally instructive substance and composed well for a change. It's pleasant to see that a few individuals still see how to compose a quality post! 메이저사이트

  14. my own blog and would like to find out where u got this from. We are linking to this great post on our website 토토커뮤니티추천

  15. I'm reading it well. This is something that 먹튀사이트 We are linking to this great post on our website

  16. I'll come and read every day. It's really nice to have a place like this It's cool every day 먹튀사이트

  17. Hello! I could have sworn I've been to this site before but after checking through some of the post I realized it's new to me. Nonetheless, I'm definitely happy I found alobong88 and I'll be book-marking and checking back frequently!

  18. That's a great article! The neatly organized content is good to see. Can I quote a blog and write it on my blog? My blog has a variety of communities including these articles. Would you like to visit me later? 메이저안전놀이터

  19. Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to assist with SEO? I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good results. If you know of any please share. Cheers! 안전토토사이트

  20. You made some good points there. I did a Google search about the topic and found most people will believe your blog. 먹튀검증

  21. 안전놀이터추천November 19, 2021 at 1:54 AM

    I am very impressed with your writing안전놀이터추천 I couldn't think of this, but it's amazing! I wrote several posts similar to this one, but please come and see!

  22. casino trực tuyếnNovember 21, 2021 at 1:48 AM

    This is the perfect trực tuyến It helped me a lot. If you have time, I hope you come to my site and share your opinions. Have a nice day.

  23. Thank you so much for such a well-written article. It’s full of insightful information. Your point of view is the best among many without fail.For certain, It is one of the best blogs in my opinion. 먹튀검증

  24. Thanks for the fantastic blog. Where do you get that kind of information written in such a perfect way? Right now I'm doing a noisy presentation and I'm looking for such great information. 온라인바카라

  25. It's the same topic , but I was quite surprised to see the opinions I didn't think of. My blog also has articles on these topics, so I look forward to your visit.오공슬롯

  26. I’m thinking some of my readers might find a bit of this interesting. Do you mind if I post a clip from this and link back? Thanks 사설토토

  27. When I read your article on this topic, the first thought seems profound and difficult. There is also a bulletin board for discussion of articles and photos similar to this topic on my site, but I would like to visit once when I have time to discuss this topic. sòng bạc


Leave a comment