Wednesday, September 30, 2020

BTRTN: Trump Debates Reality. Reality Wins.

Trailing badly in the polls, Donald Trump desperately needed to change the momentum of the Presidential race. Yeah, he changed it all right.

The first Presidential debate was not Trump vs. Biden, nor was it Republican vs. Democrat. It was not even Conservative vs. Progressive.

Rather, it was a rudderless, repulsive, sickening confrontation between one demonic man’s shameless, angry, screaming, interrupting self-justifications on the one hand, and the steady march of reality on the other.

Joe Biden, playing the role of our better angels, stood his ground, resolute and unflinching in the face of the appalling crudity, cruelty, and deceit of Darth Trump.

When the full measure of last night is taken, we will see that America came to Biden’s side.

There were many people who commented that there was “no winner” of last night’s debate; many who chose to conclude that “American lost,” or that “the people lost.”

I disagree.

America needed to see this.

Sure, we have seen a ton of video of disgusting, insulting, ignorant, and cruel bloviation from this president, but Americans have never witnessed 90 minutes of the type of unrelenting, unhinged anger and disconnection from reality that former White House insiders have warned us about in countless “tell all” books.

America needed to see – once and for all -- that the President of the United States has the impulse control of a four year old, the self-restraint of a hungry infant with gas, and the emotional intelligence of a chain saw.

You can quibble with whether Joe Biden “won” the debate, but there is no controversy that Donald Trump lost. For starters, the CNN “instant poll” said Americans preferred Biden to Trump by 60 to 28.

An unfortunate byproduct of the rudderless shit-show is that Trump’s behavior has become the entire story of this debate, and because of that overwhelming story line, few were able to focus on the aspect of the debate that should have us terrified… the things he was actually saying.

By a quantum factor, there was a single moment in this sickening evening that should make us all realize that we have barely scratched the surface of Donald Trump’s depravity. Forty minutes into the debate, moderator Chris Wallace asked Trump if he would “condemn white supremacists.”

 

Wallace: You have repeatedly criticized the vice president for not specifically calling out Antifa and other left wing extremist groups. But are you willing tonight to condemn white supremacists and militia group and to say that they need to stand down and not add to the violence in a number of these cities as we saw in Kenosha and as we’ve seen in Portland.

Trump:  Sure, I’m will to do that.

Chris Wallace:  Are you prepared specifically to do it.

Trump: I would say almost everything I see is from the left wing not from the right wing.

Wallace: But what are you saying?

Trump: I’m willing to do anything. I want to see peace.

Wallace: Well, do it, sir.

Biden: Say it, do it say it.

Trump: What do you want to call them? Give me a name, give me a name, go ahead who do you want me to condemn.

Wallace: White supremacist and right-wing militia.

Trump: Proud Boys, stand back and stand by.

 

“Proud Boys, stand back and stand by.” Donald Trump not only adamantly refused to condemn white supremacists, he actually sent a message that they should “stand by,” which can only be inferred to mean that they should be at the ready in case Trump needs their brand of violence and hate if the election does not go his way.

Yes, the President of the United States of America refused a direct, persistent, and urgent plea to condemn white supremacists in front of one of the largest global audiences he will ever encounter.

If nothing else had happened in the entire evening, that one exchange should be enough to declare the man utterly unfit for his office. Full stop.

And yet Trump managed to make other comments, assertions, and breathtaking falsehoods that must also be recorded on a commentary for the evening.

There was the protracted assertion that “forest management” was the real issue driving California’s ever-increasing wildfires… not climate change. There was his full-throttle broadside on the validity of mail-in ballots and therefore the 2020 election itself, no doubt causing people across the globe to lose faith in the country that is synonymous with democracy. He pretended that his administration actually had a healthcare plan so that he could finally “repeal and replace Obamacare.”

And then there was his attempt to completely invert the issue of his handling of the coronavirus.

One of Donald Trump’s most plainly visible psychological flaws is his capacity for projection: in his own mind, he appears aware of his most grievous failings, because he projects those exact failures onto his political opponents.  

We’ve heard before that Donald Trump has tried to say that he’s done a great job handling the coronavirus, and that if not for his leadership, “millions” would have died… not the “mere” 200,000 souls we have lost to date. But last night, for the first time, Trump actually argued that if Joe Biden had been president, millions of people would have died.

Trump: So we built the greatest economy in history. We closed it down because of the China plague. When the plague came in, we closed it down, which was very hard psychologically to do. He didn’t think we should close it down and he was wrong. Again, two million people would be dead now instead of… Still, 204,000 people is too much.”

Yes, instead of acknowledging any responsibility for the fact that the United States has handled the coronavirus far more incompetently than all but a few developed nations, Donald Trump wanted to tell people that a Joe Biden presidency would have resulted in a geometric increase in deaths.

Donald Trump came to the podium in Cleveland last night on a search and destroy mission. With so many urgent issues before our nation, we were shocked by exactly how much time – and how often -- Donald Trump spent steering the conversation to Joe Biden’s son Hunter. Much of this time is spent interrupting Joe Biden to raise the charge that the son received money from the mayor of Moscow (ah, again, the projection) and Burisma, the Ukrainian energy company that invited Hunter Biden to serve on its Board. But Trump couldn’t stop there. 

While Joe Biden was talking about the military service and subsequent death of his son Beau, Trump interrupted him to change the subject back to Hunter, alleging -- once again, falsely -- that Hunter Biden had received a dishonorable discharge from the military because of a drug problem. Joe Biden turned to camera and made a graceful statement about his son, once again making clear the stunning gulf in the humanity of the two candidates. But the savagery, gall, and sickness of Trump hung in the air.

At this point, all one could do was recall the wrenching words of Joseph Welch, the lawyer for the U.S. Army during Joe McCarthy’s witch hunts:

“Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

No, Donald Trump has no decency, so sense of shame. He is a crude, boorish, desperate man who, in his endless shouting and interrupting, was pathetically trying to drown out or change the subject from his own failures. He could not bear listening to either Chris Wallace or Joe Biden challenge the pristine narrative of his presidency that plays daily in his meetings with sycophants and nightly on Fox News. Like an insolent child, he threw a ninety minute tantrum that obliterated any constructive dialog.

Americans who tuned in to this broadcast with the hope of acquiring greater information on which to base their choice were no doubt frustrated by the incessant interruptions, the shouting, the spectacle of Trump simply trying to talk over the moderator and Biden.

But don’t think that Americans did not acquire very useful information.

In the face of the constant immature hectoring, the loud interruptions, and the vicious personal attacks on family members, Joe Biden stood at the podium and kept his eyes on the prize. Repeatedly throughout the evening, he turned and gestured directly at the camera and aimed his remarks at the American people sitting at home. He implored Americans to vote.

He came off as decent, reasonable, fully capable, and as an utterly stark contrast in temperament and substance to the raving lunatic who happens to be President of the United States.

Pay attention, Donald. There are actually three things humans cannot avoid: death, taxes, and reality itself. Yes, you’ve avoided death, so far. Yes, you’ve managed to avoid paying taxes, but that little omission is already coming back to bite you, big time.

And avoiding reality? Those who try to compete against reality inevitably find that when they get to the finish line, truth is waiting there for you. 

When you race against the truth, you never win. 

 

If you would like to be on the Born To Run The Numbers email list notifying you of each new post, please write us at borntorunthenumbers@gmail.com.

 

 

Friday, September 25, 2020

BTRTN: Get Ready for 2020’s “October Surprises”… Here Are Ten of Them

“October Surprises"...the unforeseen shockers that change the course of an election, and therefore change the course of history. It used to be that “October Surprises” were acts of God, startling facts just coming to light, or recordings that were never meant to see the light of day. But this is the era of Trump. Knowing the full power of an “October Surprise,” any number of people are working frantically right now to manufacture them.

 

RBG. The Breonna Taylor Grand Jury decision. Trump's refusal to commit to respecting the concept of the “peaceful transition of power.” And now, The Atlantic reports that the Trump campaign is exploring ways to bypass the will of the people by pressuring Republican-held state legislatures to send an alternative slate of Trump-loyalist electors to the Electoral College.

Those are the shocking headlines in just the last five days.

Sure, it is still September, but it feels like every day is bringing a textbook “October Surprise…” the kind of unforeseen bombshell news story late in an election cycle that can fundamentally change the course of the race.

U.S. presidential elections have a history of being dramatically influenced by “October Surprises,” events that throw the momentum in the direction of one candidate at a point so close to the election that the opponent has no time to recover. We can trace the concept of the “October Surprise” back to Richard Nixon’s 1968 promise that he had a “secret plan” to end the war in Vietnam. Nixon’s perverse claim was nauseating to anyone with an intellectual pulse: “Hey, Tricky, if you know how to immediately stop the maiming and killing of our soldiers, tell us now instead of conditioning your brilliant solution on your election.” 

Recent elections have actually seen multiple “October Surprises.” In 2012 (September, actually), a tape was released of Mitt Romney addressing a private meeting of wealthy donors in which he said “there are 47 percent of the people who will vote for the president no matter what," alleging that these people are "dependent upon government ... believe that they are victims ... believe the government has a responsibility to care for them ... these are people who pay no income tax." Then, just days before the election, Hurricane Sandy devastated the East coast, and President Barack Obama flew to New Jersey to discuss Federal disaster relief with Governor Chris Christie. Republican Christie gushed effusively in praise of the Democratic President’s decisive action in a crisis. These two events did much to seal Romney’s fate. 

But leave it to the hot mess of an election in 2016 to contain the most devastating “October Surprises” in American history.  

In early October, 2016, Donald Trump’s campaign appeared to have been stopped dead in its tracks by the emergence of the “Access Hollywood” tape, in which Trump gleefully bragged that his fame gave him permission to sexually violate women. In the conference rooms of major Republican donors, there was urgent talk of demanding that Trump abdicate and let Mike Pence take the top spot on the ticket.

And yet weeks later, the momentum of the campaign would be reversed, as FBI Director James Comey torpedoed Hillary Clinton’s election prospects by announcing that he was re-opening the investigation into her emails and then issuing his “exoneration” letter even closer to election day, stirring the pot yet again.  Comey’s announcement violated FBI protocols, and tipped the balance in a tight election to Trump.  

The shockers in the past two elections alone make us wary that “October Surprises” can – and repeatedly have -- thoroughly altered the trajectory of a Presidential election. But the unique anti-democratic actions of Donald Trump should put us all on guard that the “October surprises” of 2020 will not just be random acts of nature or the overreach of bumbling, self-important FBI Directors. The surprises this time may be thoroughly planned, calculated actions on the part of the campaigns, news organizations, and even foreign countries, all designed to have maximum impact in the final days of the election… when it is essentially too late for a candidate to respond to or recover from a particularly devastating assault.  

Given Donald Trump’s legendary flair for deceit, we have to recognize that “October surprises” need not be grounded in fact at all. Political operatives with rudimentary skills in photoshop and the moral compass of Josef Goebbels can concoct a brutal “October surprise” like a magician, creating doubt, shame, and an aura of guilt on an innocent opponent. In the wake of the latest egregious Supreme Court hypocrisy from McConnell and Graham, it is clear that Republicans follow no rules… not even the ones they make up.

And, of course, Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated throughout his time in office that the only way he knows how to deal with a negative story is to create even more shocking headlines that change the subject. The death of RBG not only gave Trump the opportunity to profoundly alter the composition of the Supreme Court, it has become just one more story that changes the subject away from Trump’s miserable management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Trump would love an October filled with surprises that prevent the media, Joe Biden, and the public from focusing on his actual record.

But do not presume that the Republican Party and their Pravda propaganda machine, Fox News, are alone in planning these bombshells. Foreign governments who see an advantage in the election of a specific party could take actions calculated to help or hinder a candidate. And reputable news organizations are no doubt racing to uncover the secret that could blow the lid off a presidential campaign. The difference is that The New York Times would only publish a story based on factual evidence, where the Trump campaign and Fox will eagerly make stuff up if they think it would work. 

Sure, it is fair to speculate that in 2020, the impact of “late October surprises” might be muffled by the fact that this year so many Americans will be voting well before election day. Yet it is equally plausible to suggest that the very people who are waiting to the last minute to vote are the ones who are undecided… and therefore the most vulnerable to such last-minute manipulation.

It is with these realities -- and very real phobias -- that we consider ten “October Surprises” that could be coming to a television near you in the final weeks of the 2020 campaign.  

1.Trump’s instantly universally available vaccine panacea.

Count on it: Donald Trump will call a major press conference in late October to formally announce that there is a proven, effective, and safe coronavirus vaccine... whether there is one or not, and whether any of the promising trials has actually been fully completed. Trump believes that a vaccine is the trump card that can fully negate his abject failure in handling the COVID-19 pandemic, and he will do anything and everything to claim credit that one is ready and imminently available. Indeed, his real “October Surprise” may be to insist that the vaccine will be broadly available within weeks after the election.

Trump may not be enough of a student of history to be familiar with the practices of the Third Reich, but the essence of Nazi propaganda was the belief that the vast swath of the population was comprised of unthinking, gullible oafs, who were particularly susceptible to the “Big Lie,” the outrageous assertion that they deeply want to believe. Americans desperately want the coronavirus to, in Trump’s famous words, “magically disappear,” and Trump is ready to promise that a vaccine will be ready immediately after election day in order to get re-elected. Hey, he won’t be proven wrong until after the election, so what does he care? 

But it won’t just be a “Big Lie,” it will be an enormous lie. When the head of the CDC informed the Senate about the likelihood that the vaccine would not be available to mass populations until “late second quarter, third quarter of 2021,” Trump tried to overrule him, announcing that he had “incorrect information.” Trump is absolutely determined to change the public view of his inept, ignorant management of the COVID-19 pandemic by scoring a “Hail Mary” with a coronavirus vaccine.  

And, of course, knowing Trump as we now do, he will probably wander way off script in his press conference and claim that the formula for the vaccine was his idea, that Obama couldn’t do it, and that he will prioritize the availability of the vaccine to all the swings states that vote for him.

No matter how many scientists, pharma executives, and public health officials try to tell the public the truth, Trump's vaccine "October Surprise" will be successful, if only in further deceiving the true believers who he desperately needs to turn out in droves in order to keep the election close. The damage will be done, as Fox News will put Trump’s vaccine claim in the “A bloc” of every hour until election day.  

2. William Barr will announce the “findings” of his probe into the origins of the Russia investigation.

Here is another “October Surprise” that has been in the works for months. Last year, Barr assigned U.S. Attorney John Durham of Connecticut the task of investigating the motivations and processes of the U.S. intelligence operations that ultimately led to the Mueller investigation and the impeachment of Trump.

Barr’s “investigation” is a naked ploy to turn the massive evidence of the Trump campaign’s 2016 collusion with Russia into liability for Biden. Last week Nora Dannehy, a top prosecutor in the probe, resigned because – according to interviews with her colleagues --  she felt that Barr was exerting inappropriate pressure to produce findings before election day. 

Expect Barr to make a big announcement the last week in October that Durham’s investigation has concluded that the Obama/Biden White House ordered a surreptitious effort by our intelligence operations to dig up dirt and manufacture bogus information designed to damage Trump’s candidacy. Fact? No. It will be a replay of Barr's heinous misrepresentation of the findings of the Mueller investigation.

And as sickening as it is to contemplate, we should not be surprised if the grossly corrupt Barr announces that criminal charges “should be considered” against Barack Obama and Joe Biden for their “central role” in “using their executive powers to direct the intelligence agencies to generate a false narrative in order to discredit a political opponent.” 

Yes, irony is rarely recognized by the cast of the Trump Puppet Show.    

3. Pre-election “proof” that the election has been “rigged.” 

Trump’s game plan is now crystal clear: turn out his base in droves on the hope of making the elections close enough in swing states that he can claim that he lost because massive voter fraud. He then will contest the results in court, and will count on his new 6-3 majority in the Supreme Court to overturn the will of the people and hand him a second term.

However, rather than wait until after election day, expect Louis DeJoy, the political appointee heading the U.S. Post Office, to announce in late October that he has already been presented with “incontrovertible evidence” of “massive voter fraud” on the part of the Democrats in key swing states.  

Who would put it past the corrupt Republican Party to actually print thousands of bogus mail-in voter forms, and then present their own fraudulent forms as evidence that had been “discovered in the mail system,” as clear proof of the Democrats tampering in the ballot process?" 

The October surprise: the Republicans won’t wait for the election results, and won’t wait until the ballots are already in the hands of election officials. They will attempt to poison the well in advance by claiming to already have evidence of voter fraud before Election Day.

4. Allegations of illicit and abusive sexual behavior by Biden. 

It’s actually pretty easy to manufacture an “October Surprise” from thin air. Imagine that Fox News announces that it has “explosive video evidence” that proves that Joe Biden used his power as Vice President to force a woman into a non-consensual sexual relationship.  

Here is where Photoshop artists will have a field day. Suddenly, in late October, photographs emerge on sketchy news outlets that allege to show Joe Biden entering the home of a suburban Washington woman who will accuse him of using the power of his office to demand sexual favors. It will be easy enough to generate: simply hire a man of comparable age and build to Biden, and photograph him at the front door of the woman’s home. Then hire a loyal Republican woman to make the allegation.

A modest amount of Photoshop artistry will make the “visitor” appear to be Biden.  

As has happened so often, Fox News does not feel a need to authenticate a story. They'd just constantly air "reports of the Joe Biden sex scandal" on a continuous loop until the election.  

Character assassination 101.  

5. Trumped-up “medical evidence” that Joe Biden’s mental faculties are compromised by “rapidly advancing Alzheimer’s disease.” 

We should expect it: some organization – the Russians, a White supremacist cult, Qanon – will attempt to create a bogus medical file that allegedly chronicles Joe Biden’s "eroding mental acuity," which will be “leaked,” having been supposedly smuggled out of a private medical facility by a “whistle blower” who felt that it was crucial that the nation was aware of Biden’s supposed mental deterioration. 

It will all be fake. But Fox News will eat it up.

6. A foreign power will make a major announcement designed to enhance Trump’s stature.

If Vladimir Putin or Kim Jong-un want to keep their puppet in the White House, one of their best ploys would be to make Trump look good on the international stage.

How about if Vladimir Putin decides that late October would be the perfect time to announce that he wishes to engage in comprehensive nuclear disarmament negotiations if Donald Trump is re-elected President? What if Kim Jong-un issues an utterly disingenuous statement that based on his admiration for and trust of Donald Trump, he wishes to normalize relations with South Korea and abandon his own nuclear aspirations if Trump is re-elected?

It doesn’t matter if these intentions are forgotten the minute the election is over. They’d help accomplish the common goal of these two dictators: keep Trump in office.

Ok, it this all too depressing? Remember: not all of the “October surprises” will be designed to damage Biden.  

There’s no doubt that respected journalists in highly reputable news organizations are aggressively pursuing every possible source to get at the truth about some of the biggest liabilities in Donald Trump’s flimsy façade.  

7. The real story about Trump's unscheduled trip to Walter Reed.

In November, 2019, Trump made a hastily arranged visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, and the explanation at the time – that Trump was simply completing a delayed portion of his annual physical – raised more questions than answers. Recently, Michael Schmidt of The New York Times reported in a new book that Mike Pence had been instructed to be “on standby” during Trump’s time at the hospital.

What was curious is that Donald Trump responded to Schmidt’s book with a tweet denying that he had suffered a series of “mini-strokes,” but Schmidt had never mentioned “mini-strokes” in the book. The two weeks that Trump spent chanting “person woman man camera tv” as evidence of his sturdy mental capacity seemed to be further evidence that Trump doth protest a bit too much.  

Bet your bottom dollar that enterprising reporters are probing every contact to find out exactly why Trump made that unscheduled visit. Given his two-handed water glass lifts, his constant mangling of language, and his perverse psychological need to project his own weaknesses, sins, failings, and deceits onto his opponents, it’s a good bet that where there is smoke there is fire. 

Were facts to come out in October indicating that significant medical incident had occurred -- one which was concealed from the public -- it would be another gut punch to Trump’s prospects. 

8. A smoking gun about “what Putin has on Trump” 

If there is a Holy Grail of investigative journalism, it goes to the reporter who finally figures out exactly why Donald Trump kneels before Vladimir Putin, refusing to confront the Russian despot on his election meddling, the poisoning of his political opponents, and for putting a bounty on the heads of American soldiers. Putin’s grip on Trump is so overwhelming and yet so mysterious that Americans ache for an explanation. The journalist who can decisively solve this riddle will be Woodward, Bernstein, Cronkite, Bradlee, and Edward R. Murrow rolled into one.  

If a reporter can deliver a major revelation on this subject – concrete proof of financial debt to Putin, recordings of Trump’s personal involvement in soliciting Putin’s help in the 2016 election, or evidence that Putin possesses has personal dirt on Trump – it could drop a neutron bomb on Trump’s re-election prospects.

9. Evidence of criminal activity by the Trump Organization in New York.

We’ve all been aware of the cat and mouse game between New York District Attorney Cy Vance and Trump’s lawyers as the New York prosecutor draws ever closer to getting his hands on Donald Trump’s tax records. Similarly, New York State Attorney General Letitia James recently took legal measures to force Eric Trump to testify about the financial dealings of the Trump Organization, which he has now agreed to do… after the election. Neither governmental enforcement agency appears ready to actually charge Trump or his company with criminal behavior, and it remains a matter of unsettled law whether charges can even be brought against a sitting President. 

However, don’t rule out a classic massive investigative probe by The New York Times that provides enough fact to hypothesize about the scope and magnitude of criminality tied directly to Trump in his role as head of the Trump Organization.   

10. George W. Bush and Barack Obama join forces to endorse Biden. 

There is already been a formidable cast of Republican bold-faced names who have either refused to endorse Donald Trump for President, or who have actually come out and endorsed Joe Biden.  

Colin Powell, John Kasich, Chuck Hagel, Cindy McCain, and Christine Todd Whitman have all endorsed Biden. Former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis has openly excoriated Trump’s leadership, and William H. McRaven, the retired Navy admiral who directed the raid that killed Osama bin Laden, has openly opposed Trump’s re-election. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski is “struggling” with whether to support Trump or not. The Republican candidate for President who preceded Trump – Mitt Romney – voted to impeach Trump and will not support his re-election.  

So far, the defections of these prominent Republicans has elicited a yawn from the Trump faithful. 

However, there is one name and one action that could possibly be damaging to Trump.

George W. Bush, who used to be the most vilified Republican President until Donald Trump came along, is now remarkably popular. When Bush left office in 2009, his approval rating was an appalling 33% -- actually less than Donald Trump’s rating at its worst. But popular opinion has changed. By 2018, approval of George W. Bush had soared to 61%. It’s fair to say that Bush is far, far more popular today than Trump.

What if Bush – the last Republican President – teamed up with Barack Obama to film a joint endorsement of Joe Biden?

Imagine if these two party icons collaborated on a video that condemned Trump’s divisiveness, disrespect for the Constitution, and his assertion that those who fought and died in our military are “losers?” Perhaps it is unlikely. But George W. Bush must be seething at the gross disrespect that Trump has shown him, his father, his brother, the office of the Presidency, and the military in which his father so nobly served. Maybe. Just maybe.

There you have it. Ten possible October surprises... and yet we could go on forever.

Of course the real truth is that the ones that can’t be predicted that always seem to be the most crushing.

And, yet, then again, would any of it make the slightest difference?

Could any “October surprises” really change the course of the election in the way Jim Comey threw the 2016 election to Donald Trump?

Many would argue that minds are already made up, and the truth of it is that through all the twists, turns, and news cycles in recent weeks, the national polling on the presidential race has remained remarkable stable. 

It certainly feels that after every disgrace, lie, and assault on the Constitution in the past three years, nothing on heaven or earth would convince a Trump loyalist to abandon him at this point.

Sadly, it’s actually far easier to imagine a Biden support being alienated by an allegation of wrong-doing than a Trump supporter: the latter have been conditioned to believe that all negative press about the president is “fake news,” and none of the outrages he has committed in office have made the slightest dent in their devotion.  

But it all comes down to this: Trump is going to do every single thing he can to steal this election: lying about his accomplishments, lying about his opponent, suppressing the vote, casting doubt on the validity of the results, attempting to undermine the Electoral College, and screaming that it is all rigged… all, likely, with the simple goal of taking the decision out of the hands of the people and putting it in the hands of a Republican majority Supreme Court. 

We've said it many times before: Donald Trump desperately needs to retain the presidency because he knows that it is the only way he will stay out of jail. He will do anything to win.

The past four years have been a nightmare, 2020 has been a catastrophe, and yet still we must understand this: it is actually going to get worse before it gets better.  

If, indeed, it ever gets better. 

It's time to get back to the phone banks, the post cards, and making the donations -- no matter how many urgent emails you end up getting from John Hickenlooper. The time is now to do everything we can to win big -- to win by a big enough margin in enough states that Trump's effort to characterize his loss as a fraud will collapse. 

Buckle your seat belts, America. We’ve predicted ten “October surprises.” And yet is likely that the ones we haven’t predicted are going to be the ones that really rock the election.  

Just ask President Hillary Clinton. 

 

If you would like to be on the Born To Run The Numbers email list notifying you of each new post, please write us at borntorunthenumbers@gmail.com.


Wednesday, September 23, 2020

BTRTN Election Snapshot: Democrats' Odds of a Trifecta Continue to Rise Slightly

Tom with the latest update on the state of all the national races. 

STATE OF THE RACE

The political landscape in the stretch drive to Election Day has been utterly upended by the death of revered liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and the ensuing GOP rush-to-confirm hyper-hypocrisy led by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

Or has it?

We’ll see.  It’s very early in the process, no matter how accelerated it promises to be.  We don’t even have a nominee yet and then, we have the whole confirmation circus to get through, likely to be compressed within the remaining election cycle.  This is a classic case of spraying lighter fluid on the already roaring flames of the Biden-Trump election showdown.  If you thought the Brett Kavanaugh hearings were unseemly, they will seem like a friendly round of croquet before this one is through.  It is impossible to foretell the impact all this will have on the electorate, and don’t forget – they are already casting votes.

But as of now, early polling indicates the Republican’s about-face in filling this seat after refusing to consider Barack Obama’s pick (Merritt Garland) in 2016 is not helping them one bit -- and may even be hurting.  There have been at least three polls that indicate the plurality, if not the majority of Americans oppose Trump naming Ginsberg’s successor rather than the November winner – Morning Consult has it at 50/37, YouGov at 51/42, and Ipsos/Reuters has it all the way up to 62/23.  In each poll, the independents reflect the overall figures. 

Trump and McConnell are not expanding the GOP base, for sure, with this tack, and if they are thinking the enthusiasm factor will be a plus to get out the vote, the Morning Consult polls appears to support the opposite.  It is the Democrats who appear to be more energized by the GOP push.  To wit: the percentage of Democrats who said the Supreme Court was a “very important” factor in their election decision jumped 12 points after RBG’s death, to 60%, while the Republicans, on the same question, increased by only four points, to only 54%.  For those more persuaded by anecdotes, today I went to a Zoom texting training session, one of 1,400 volunteers attending this single session.  And, of course, the Democrats have been donating by the bushel since RBG's death, over $100,000 per minute in the immediate aftermath, and over $90 million in the first 28 hours

Trump strategists will argue that the court battle changes the dominant subject of the campaign from COVID-19, a terrible issue for Trump and the GOP (polls indicate that American disapprove of Trump’s handling of COVID-19 by a 56/40 margin) to a more favorable one, filling the courts with conservative judges.  But the Biden camp is already turning the SCOTUS issue into a health care issue, another terrible topic for Trump and the GOP, who have never put forward a plan to replace Obamacare.  Health care (and health insurance) remains a leading issue on the minds of voters, along with COVID and the economy.  Trump, of course, vastly refers to talk about the economy and the courts, while Biden will focus on COVID and health care.

As for the down ballot races, it is instructive to see how the GOP incumbents who are in reelection fights for their political lives are handling the SCOTUS issue.  Martha McSally of Arizona and Thom Tillis of North Carolina both quickly jumped on the McConnell bandwagon, while Corey Gardner of Colorado waited a bit before doing so.  Susan Collins, badly bruised in Maine by her support of Brett Kavanaugh and later Trump in the impeachment hearings, was the first to announce that she opposed the McConnell process.

And what of Lindsey Graham?  Locked in a dead heat with Jaime Harrison in South Carolina, he found himself portrayed, with good reason, as the poster child of GOP hypocrisy, with endlessly looping video of his hard-to-spin statement from 2016:  “I want you to use my words against me.  If there’s a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said let’s let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination.”  Suffice to say, those words are indeed being used against him.

But there is a silver lining for Graham as well.  He will command the spotlight in the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, as Chair, and from that platform remind conservative South Carolinians that he is dead solid behind Trump and doing his bidding.  And by Graham’s calculus, that is worth a flip-flop, even one of Olympian proportion.

 

THE ODDS

As of this moment, the Democrats have a very good chance of pulling off a “trifecta” – Joe Biden winning the presidency, the Democrats flipping the Senate, and also maintaining control of the House (the latter almost a certainty).

Election Odds of Democrats' Winning/Controlling

President

Senate

House

82%

67%

99%

Electoral Votes

Composition/(Dem Change)

Composition/(Dem Change)

335 Biden/203 Trump

50 Dem*/50 GOP (D +3)

250 Dems/188 GOP (Dems +17)

*Including Independents who caucus with the Democrats.  Also assumes Biden wins the presidency, which would require the Democrats to get to 50 seats to control the Senate.

These odds have been reasonably stable over time, though unmistakably inching upwards for the Democrats.

BTRTN Democrats Odds of Winning

Date >>>

5/9

5/28

7/1

8/2

8/24

9/8

9/15

9/22

Presidency

n/a

73%

82%

82%

81%

79%

81%

82%

Senate Control

59%

59%

59%

62%

62%

65%

65%

67%

House Control

99%

99%

99%

99%

99%

99%

99%

99%

Having delivered this favorable Blue news, this would be a very good time to reintroduce our “warning label,” which should be the mantra for all Democrats. 

WARNING:  No matter how good the numbers look at any given time, the Democrats will not win any election unless they work hard to earn it – registering voters, calling, texting, donating – throughout the summer and fall, up to and including Election Day.

And remember, this is a snapshot, not a forecast.


THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE

The national polls continue to be very positive for Joe Biden, and have changed little over time.  He remains +7 points ahead of Trump.  Keep in mind when you look at national polls that, given the inherent GOP advantage in the Electoral College make-up, Biden has to be up +4 to be considered truly “ahead.”  Yes, the GOP advantage is that pronounced, as Hillary Clinton discovered in 2016, when she won the national vote by 2.1 percentage points but lost the electoral vote.  But +7 is a very healthy margin, worth an extra 5-6 million votes for Biden versus Clinton; it would be very difficult for Trump to pull off an “inside straight” again, finding those magical 78,000 votes in those swing states, given a margin nearing, perhaps, eight million votes.

TRUMP VS BIDEN HEAD-TO-HEAD NATIONAL POLLS

 

Jul

Aug

wk ending Sep 5

wk ending Sep 12

wk ending Sep 19

Biden

49

49

50

50

49

Trump

41

42

43

43

43

Diff

8.0

7.4

7.0

7.3

6.7

Biden continues to dominate the swing state polls as well.  In the month of September, there have been 71 polls across 14 swings states and two swing districts (Maine’s 2nd and Nebraska’s 2nd), and Biden is ahead in 57 of them; Trump has led in only eight, with six ties.

At this stage, we see Biden with an 82% chance of winning the presidency, up a tick mark since last week’s 81%.  That modest improvement is mostly accounted for by two BTRTN rating changes in the last week, both in Biden’s direction, and both in Maine.

Ratings Changes

From

To

Maine

D Likely

D Solid

Maine 2nd District

R TU

D TU

Biden is thus ahead in states and districts that total 335 electoral votes to 203 for Trump.  At this point, Biden could lose ALL EIGHT toss-up states and still win the election.  Biden has many “paths” to 270 votes, but the simplest one, perhaps, is to keep every state Hillary Clinton won (and he is ahead of all of them), flip Arizona, Michigan and Wisconsin, each of which he leads by a healthy 6-7 points, and then flip either Maine’s 2nd or Nebraska’s 2nd.  That gets him to 270. 

Mind you, Biden, also leads in Pennsylvania by +4, which is worth another 20 electoral votes, and is in essentially dead heats in those 8 toss-ups states.  If Biden swept all the toss-ups he could get to a whopping 413, a modern day landslide.

Trump can only count on his solid base of 125 electoral votes in 22 states or districts.  The rest are either toss ups now or leaning to Biden in various degrees. 

BTRTN PRESIDENT SNAPSHOT

BTRTN Rating

Entities

Electoral Votes

DEM TOTAL

30

335

Dem Solid

19

212

Dem Likely

2

14

Dem Lean

5

63

Dem Toss-up

4

46

GOP Toss-up

4

78

GOP Lean

0

0

GOP Likely

0

0

GOP Solid

22

125

GOP TOTAL

26

203

 

Here is the state-by-state look.

BTRTN 2020 PRESIDENTIAL SNAPSHOT

States

2020 Electoral Votes

2016 Margin

Swing State Poll Avg

BTRTN Rating

Solid Dem (19 states or districts, 212 electoral votes): California, Colorado, Connecticut, DC, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maine 1st District, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington

 

 

 

 

 

Minnesota

10

Clinton +2

Biden +9

D Likely

New Hampshire

4

Clinton +0.3

Biden +6

D Likely

Wisconsin

10

Trump +1

Biden +7

D Lean

Michigan

16

Trump +0.2

Biden +7

D Lean

Arizona

11

Trump +4

Biden +6

D Lean

Nevada

6

Clinton +2

Biden +4

D Lean

Pennsylvania

20

Trump +1

Biden +4

D Lean

Nebraska 2nd District

1

Trump +2

Biden +7

D TU

Maine 2nd District

1

Trump +10

Biden +4

D TU

Florida

29

Trump +1

Biden +2

D TU

North Carolina

15

Trump +4

Biden +1

D TU

Ohio

18

Trump +11

Trump +1

R TU

Texas

38

Trump +9

Trump +2

R TU

Iowa

6

Trump +9

Trump +2

R TU

Georgia

16

Trump +5

Trump +4

R TU

 

 

 

 

 

Solid GOP (22 states or districts, 125 electoral votes):  Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nebraska 1st and 3rd Districts, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, West Virginia, Wyoming


THE SENATE

The Democrats, of course, need to flip a net of +3 seats, along with a Biden win, to gain control of the Senate with 50 seats (including the two Independents that caucus with them).  With the prospects of holding Alabama looking exceedingly grim, the fate is Senate control will come down to whether the Democrats can flip at least four seats.

Right now two of those potential flips – in Arizona and Colorado – are looking very solid for the Dems, with Mark Kelly and John Hickenlooper, respectively, sporting leads approaching double digits.  And two other potential flips are looking very promising, Maine and North Carolina, where the Democratic challengers Sara Gideon and Cal Cunningham, respectively,are up by roughly 4-5 percentage points.

And, remarkably, the Democrats are putting on tremendous pressure on five other GOP-held seats:  Iowa, Georgia (the regular election), Kansas, Montana and South Carolina.  Limited polling indicates Alaska is close, too, though we don’t quite believe that yet.  And who knows what will come out of Georgia’s special election, which will have a jungle primary on Election Day, setting up a potential run-off in January.

So at this juncture, that net seems more likely than not – we now have increased the odds to 67% from 65%.  Those increased odds reflect positive Democratic movement in three races that have resulted in BTRTN ratings changes as follows:

Ratings Changes

From

To

Minnesota

D Lean

D Likely

Ga

R Lean

R Toss Up

Montana

R Lean

R Toss Up

Our ratings now falls as follows, pointing to a 50/50 composition post-election, enough for the Dems to claim control with a Biden win, with Kamala Harris presiding with the tiebreaking vote.

BTRTN SENATE SNAPSHOT

BTRTN Rating

Current

Flips

DEM TOTAL

50

4

Dem Holdover

35

0

Dem Solid

9

0

Dem Likely

3

2

Dem Lean

3

2

Dem Toss-up

0

0

GOP Toss-up

5

0

GOP Lean

1

0

GOP Likely

3

1

GOP Solid

11

0

GOP Holdover

30

0

GOP TOTAL

50

1

Here is how each race “in play” is shaping up, in a nutshell.

SENATE SNAPSHOT

State

Inc. Party

Dem Nominee

GOP Nominee

2014 Margin

2016  Pres Margin

BTRTN Rating

2020 Recent Polls Avg

Dem Seats not up for reelection in 2020 (35)

Solid Dem (9): Delaware (Coons), Illinois (Durbin), Mass (Markey), NH (Shaheen), NM (Lujon), NJ (Booker), Oregon (Merkeley), RI (Reed), VA (Warner)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Arizona

R

Kelly

McSally

D + 2*

R + 3

D Likely Flip

D + 10

Colorado

R

Hickenlooper

Gardner

R + 2

D + 5

D Likely Flip

D + 8

Minnesota

D

Smith

Lewis

D + 11*

D + 2

D Likely

D + 7

Michigan

D

Peters

James

D + 13

R + 0.2

D Lean

D + 8

Maine

R

Gideon

Collins

R + 37

D + 3

D Lean Flip

D + 5

N. Carolina

R

Cunningham

Tillis

R + 2

R + 4

D Lean Flip

D + 4

Iowa

R

Greenfield

Ernst

R + 8

R + 10

R Toss Up

Even

S. Carolina

R

Harrison

Graham

R + 15

R + 14

R Toss Up

Even

Georgia

R

Ossoff

Perdue

R + 8

R + 5

R Toss Up

R + 1

Montana

R

Bullock

Daines

R + 18

R + 20

R Toss Up

R + 2

Kansas

R

Bollier

Marshall

R + 11

R + 21

R Toss Up

R + 2

Georgia (S)

R

open primary 11/3; run off 1/5/21

R+14*

R + 5

R Lean

n/a

Alaska

R

Gross

Sullivan

R + 2

R + 15

R Likely

Even

Kentucky

R

McGrath

McConnell

R + 15

R + 30

R Likely

R + 9

Alabama

D

Jones

Tuberville

D +2*

R + 28

R Likely Flip

R + 9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Solid GOP (11):  Arkansas (Cotton), Idaho (Risch), Louisiana (Cassidy), Mississippi (Hyde-Smith), Nebraska (Sasse), Oklahoma (Inhofe), South Dakota (Rounds), Tennessee (Hagerty), Texas (Cornyn), West Virginia (Caputo), Wyoming (Lummus)

GOP seats not up for reelection in 2020:  (30)

* Arizona margin from 2018 election (Sinema beat McSally; McSally was appointed after McCain's death); Alabama from 2017 special election; Minnesota from 2018 special election


THE HOUSE

The Democrats already hold a large majority in the House.  The current count is 232 Democrats to 198 Republicans with one Libertarian and four vacancies.  When you take the four vacancies and apportion them back to their original holder, and assign the Libertarian to the GOP (he’s Justin Amish, the former GOP turned Independent turned Libertarian, who is not running for reelection), then the effective split is 233 to 205.

By far the most important predictor of how many seats will switch parties is the generic ballot.  For years we have come within a few seats based on our regression models that feature that variable.  For instance, in 2018, BTRTN predicted the Democrats would flip 38 seats from red to blue, and they actually flipped 41 seats.

This year, the generic ballot continues to heavily favor the Democrats.  The most recent set of generic ballot polls, in September, continue to show the Democrats up by roughly seven points.  If the Democrats maintain this margin through Election Day, they would be expected to flip 17 more seats, give or take a few, to get to a whopping 250 to 188 margin.

Also – there is simply no way the GOP can possibly flip the House.  We are being kind to put the odds of the Dems holding the House at 99%; we are simply allowing for the highly unlikely threat of a meteor landing.

HOUSE SNAPSHOT

House

As of 9/23

Generic Ballot

Dem + 6.9

 

 

Democrats

250 (+17)

Republicans

188 (-17)

And always remember this:

WARNING:  No matter how good the numbers look at any given time, the Democrats will not win any election unless they work hard to earn it – registering voters, calling, texting, donating – throughout the summer and fall, up to and including Election Day.